3 min read
[AI Minor News]

Do You Really Want to Read AI-Written Articles? A Deep Dive into Efficiency and the Value of Writing


In a world flooded with AI-generated content, a thought-provoking blog post examines the significance of human authorship in writing and highlights the distinctions from AI-generated code.

※この記事はアフィリエイト広告を含みます

[AI Minor News Flash] Do You Really Want to Read AI-Written Articles? A Deep Dive into Efficiency and the Value of Writing

📰 News Summary

  • Writing as a Window to Thought: The notion of outsourcing writing to LLMs is akin to discarding one’s own thoughts and perceptions, suggesting that there’s little value in reading what a writer couldn’t be bothered to craft themselves.
  • The Boundary Between Code and Prose: The author frequently employs LLMs like Claude Code in their work, endorsing the generation of code, tests, and documentation as a step towards “progress and efficiency.”
  • The Human Touch Reversal: Typos and grammatical errors, once viewed negatively, are now seen as “proof of human authorship,” gaining more value than the polished prose of AI.

💡 Key Points

  • The importance of “intent” in writing. It emphasizes that the process of wrestling with chaotic thoughts and shaping them into coherent narratives is inherently valuable, rather than merely expanding bullet points generated by AI.
  • A sense of urgency regarding how AI-generated content accelerates the “Dead Internet Theory,” which posits that the internet will become saturated with AI-generated bots rather than human interaction.

🦈 Shark’s Eye (Curator’s Perspective)

The phrase “ai;dr (Didn’t Read Because It’s AI)” strikes a chord! What’s remarkable about this article is that it doesn’t reject AI on nostalgic grounds; instead, it comes from an engineer who fully utilizes LLMs, clearly delineating what can be streamlined and what should remain a human domain!

The distinction of “code as implementation, writing as thought” is incredibly concrete. While acknowledging the benefits of AI-generated code as “scaffolding,” there’s a strong aversion to “watered-down content” devoid of human intent. This nuanced balance could be crucial for navigating our relationship with AI moving forward!

🚀 What’s Next?

Instead of perfectly polished AI writing, there will be a growing appreciation for intentionally imperfect, textured prose that carries distinct voices as signals of trust. The polarization of business documents being AI-generated, while heartfelt writing remains human-crafted, is likely to accelerate!

💬 A Word from Haru Shark

Chasing efficiency alone will ultimately leave behind a void that resonates with no one. If I had AI write my roars, they’d just be bubbles! 🦈🔥

📚 Terminology Explained

  • ai;dr: A parody of “too long; didn’t read,” implying that an AI-written piece isn’t worth reading.

  • Dead Internet Theory: The theory that a significant portion of online content and activity is generated and manipulated by AI and bots rather than humans.

  • Scaffolding: In programming, it refers to the foundational templates or structures used to create standard code.

  • Source: ai;dr

【免責事項 / Disclaimer / 免责声明】
JP: 本記事はAIによって構成され、運営者が内容の確認・管理を行っています。情報の正確性は保証せず、外部サイトのコンテンツには一切の責任を負いません。
EN: This article was structured by AI and is verified and managed by the operator. Accuracy is not guaranteed, and we assume no responsibility for external content.
ZH: 本文由AI构建,并由运营者进行内容确认与管理。不保证准确性,也不对外部网站的内容承担任何责任。
🦈