3 min read
[AI Minor News]

Beware of the AI Agent's 'Quadratic Cost Explosion'! Cash Read Costs Dominate After 50,000 Tokens


Analysis shows that in long conversations with coding agents, cash read costs accumulate, ultimately reaching 87% of total expenses.

※この記事はアフィリエイト広告を含みます

[AI Minor News Flash] Beware of the AI Agent’s ‘Quadratic Cost Explosion’!

📰 News Summary

  • In the loop processing of AI agents, the longer the conversation history, the more the ‘cost of reading from cache’ becomes a dominant factor.
  • Analysis indicates that around 27,500 tokens, cash reading accounts for half of the cost of the next API call, and by 50,000 tokens, it becomes the majority of expenses.
  • In a real development conversation, it was found that cash read costs reached a staggering 87% of the total costs.

💡 Key Points

  • Accumulating Cache Costs: LLM providers charge not only for input and output but also for writing and reading from cache. Since reading costs increase with “number of tokens × number of calls,” it demonstrates a quadratic increase.
  • Simulation Results: Based on Anthropic’s pricing model (like Opus 4.5), cash read costs begin to dominate at just around 20,000 tokens.
  • Accuracy Trade-off: Reducing the frequency of LLM calls to cut costs risks losing feedback loops, which may prevent agents from reaching the correct goals.

🦈 Shark’s Eye (Curator’s Perspective)

The structure where money evaporates just by “re-reading” past logs gets scarier the longer the conversation goes! What’s remarkable about this article is that it doesn’t just say “LLMs are expensive” but concretely shows how the cost structure dramatically changes at specific token counts (20,000 to 50,000). This “quadratic trap” will catch coding agents, who often call tools repeatedly for trial and error, right off the bat. Implementing strategies to use sub-agents in order to keep the main context clean will be essential for cost design going forward!

🚀 What’s Next?

  • In agent development, the importance of ‘hierarchical agents’ that summarize only the necessary information or separate context per task will grow, rather than maintaining a bloated main context.
  • A price war among providers may intensify, leading to further reductions in cash read costs or more efficient incremental caching solutions.

💬 Sharky’s Takeaway

Just because it’s convenient doesn’t mean you should ramble on—before you know it, cash reading costs could leave you with a gaping hole in your wallet! Smartly wrapping things up is the hallmark of a savvy shark and a savvy agent! 🦈🔥

📚 Terminology

  • Cache Reads: This refers to the process of accessing previously stored (cached) information from the server when LLMs need to reuse past conversation data. It’s usually cheaper than standard input but accumulates as volume increases.

  • Quadratic Cost: The rapid increase in costs that occurs as a variable (in this case, the number of tokens or call frequency) increases, where costs grow proportionally to the square of the variable.

  • Context Window: The frame of information that an LLM can process at once. Agents stuff history into this frame, but the more they pack in, the higher the reading costs soar.

  • Source: Expensively Quadratic: The LLM Agent Cost Curve

【免責事項 / Disclaimer / 免责声明】
JP: 本記事はAIによって構成され、運営者が内容の確認・管理を行っています。情報の正確性は保証せず、外部サイトのコンテンツには一切の責任を負いません。
EN: This article was structured by AI and is verified and managed by the operator. Accuracy is not guaranteed, and we assume no responsibility for external content.
ZH: 本文由AI构建,并由运营者进行内容确认与管理。不保证准确性,也不对外部网站的内容承担任何责任。
🦈